Association between prealbumin, all-cause mortality, and response to nutrition treatment in patients at nutrition risk: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. 2023;47(3):408-419

Plain language summary

Malnutrition amongst the elderly and those who are hospitalised due to multiple illnesses is frequent and increases risk of death. There have however been studies to show that there may be a way of identifying individuals at risk of malnutrition through measurements of biological markers. Prealbumin is a protein made in the liver that has been shown in smaller trials to be a possible biomarker for individuals at risk of malnutrition. This large cohort study of 517 individuals aimed to determine if prealbumin was associated with death and if nutritional support would improve survival. The results showed that individuals who were at risk of malnutrition with low prealbumin levels had almost double the mortality rate after 6 months. However individualised nutritional support did not improve mortality. It was concluded that prealbumin is a prognostic marker for death in nutritionally at-risk patients but does not identify individuals who may respond to nutritional support. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that prealbumin may be helpful in identifying mortality risk amongst individuals at risk of malnutrition but not those who may benefit from personalised nutrition recommendations.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Because of the shorter half-life as compared with albumin, serum prealbumin concentrations have been proposed to be useful nutrition biomarkers for the assessment of patients at nutrition risk. In a post hoc analysis of patients at nutrition risk from a randomized controlled nutrition trial, we tested the hypothesis that (1) prealbumin is associated with higher all-cause 180-day mortality rates and that (2) individualized nutrition support compared with usual-care nutrition more effectively improves survival at 30 days in patients with low prealbumin levels compared with patients with normal prealbumin levels. METHODS We performed a prespecified cohort study in patients included in the pragmatic, Swiss, multicenter randomized controlled EFFORT trial comparing the effects of individualized nutrition support with usual care. We studied low prealbumin concentrations (<0.17 g/L) in a subgroup of 517 patients from one participating center. RESULTS A total of 306 (59.2%) patients (mean age 71.9 years, 53.6% men) had low admission prealbumin levels (<0.17 g/L). There was a significant association between low prealbumin levels and mortality at 180 days (115/306 [37.6%] vs 47/211 [22.3%], fully adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.59, 95% CI 1.11-2.28; P = 0.011). Prealbumin levels significantly improved the prognostic value of the Nutritional Risk Screening total score regarding mortality prediction at short- and long-term. The difference in mortality between patients receiving individualized nutrition support and usual-care nutrition was similar for patients with low prealbumin levels compared with patients with normal prealbumin levels (HR=0.90 [95% CI=0.51-1.59] vs HR=0.88 [95% CI=0.35-2.23]) with no evidence for interaction (P = 0.823). CONCLUSION Among medical inpatients at nutrition risk, low admission prealbumin levels correlated with different nutrition markers and higher mortality risk, but patients with low or high prealbumin levels had a similar benefit from nutrition support. Further studies should identify nutrition markers that help further personalize nutrition interventions.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Immune and inflammation
Patient Centred Factors : Mediators/Malnutrition
Environmental Inputs : Diet ; Nutrients
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition
Functional Laboratory Testing : Blood

Methodological quality

Jadad score : Not applicable
Allocation concealment : Not applicable

Metadata